Subscribe Now!
About CRC
Home
Site Map
Help
Contact Us
About Platinum
Platinum Resources
Core Privileges
Credentialing Primary Source Verification Directory
Benchmarking Reports
Policy and Procedures
Members Resources
Credentialing Resource Center Journal
Clinical Privilege White Papers
Medical Staff Talk
Member Privileging Forms
Consulting Resources
CRC Consulting
Advisors
Events
Free Resources
CRC Blog
Credentialing Resource
Center Connection
Credentialing Links
New Tech Links
 
Credentialing Primary Source Verification Directory
Visit our sister website for credentials verification help!
 

Credentialing Resource Center Journal

 
CRC is now available online! Receive updates up to four days earlier than the print version and save on shipping costs.

To view the entire newsletter issue, click the “View Entire Issue” link below


July 1, 2010   ( Volume 19, Issue 7) view entire issue
 
Washington moves toward a statewide credentialing and privileging process

Unless you’re from the North West, the healthcare reform news coming out of Washington, DC, last year may have overshadowed similar reform efforts in Washington state. There, the state legislature passed Senate Bill 5346 (SB 5346) in April 2009. 


 
Five ways to improve your credentialing confidentiality practices

Few would disagree that confidentiality is an important aspect of the medical staff services department (MSSD) to maintain. Yet the deeper meaning of its importance becomes apparent when you begin to think about the consequences of a breach of confidentiality. The results can include costly lawsuits from violated practitioners, a loss of trust between medical staff leadership and members, and valuable time spent rectifying the situation that could have been used for other projects.


 
How to tell the (uncomfortable) truth on FPPE

By now, medical staffs know the purpose of focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE): It’s a focused review to evaluate a practitioner’s performance of newly requested privileges or privileges marred by competency concerns. It’s been several years since The Joint Commission rolled out these peer-to-peer evaluations, yet there’s a human aspect to these evaluations that the standards can’t easily prescribe. It’s challenging for practitioners—as it is for everyone—to give honest feedback about a colleague, especially if it happens to be negative. 


 

 
Special Reports

 

Platinum Privilege Subscribe Now!
 
Sign up
 
Core Privilege Plus
 
Assessing the Competency of Low-Volume Practitioners:
The Joint Commission requires that hospitals verify physician competence using performance data. Yet organizations often have little or no data related to the competency of low- and no-volume physicians. Medical staff leaders are therefore challenged to develop a strategy that guides the hospital's relationship with low- and no-volume providers, and medical staff services departments are challenged to establish systems to verify physician competence. This fully updated book and CD-ROM set offers the necessary tools and strategies for medical staff leaders and professionals to manage the increasing number of low- and no-volume providers and comply with Joint Commission standards.

CRC Platinum members receive a 20% discount on this product. To receive your discount either log in
or become a member.
 
About HCPro | Privacy Statement | Contact Us
Copyright © 2012 Credentialing Resource Center.